[= e-Culture, Bd. 12], 2009, 264 S., zahlr. Abb., ISBN 978-3-89626-707-8, 22,80 EUR
Zurück zur letzten Seite Zur Startseite des Verlages
|
|
Die
Bedeutung von eLearning für die Veränderungen der Bildungs- und
Forschungslandschaft sowie der Wissensgesellschaft im globalen
Wettbewerb, aber auch für die Entwicklung von Unternehmen ist allgemein
anerkannt. Zugleich impliziert die Besonderheit des eLearning als ein
breit einsetzbares und stark individualisierbares Lerninstrument, dass
neben dem jeweiligen Lernkontext auch die besonderen Voraussetzungen der
Nutzergruppe bei der Konzipierung des Instruments zu berücksichtigen
sind. Eine umfassende Implementierung von eLearning in allen Bereichen
der Aus- und Weiterbildung hat sich zudem insbesondere an der konkreten
Frage zu orientieren, wo und wie sein Einsatz einen wirklichen Mehrwert
gegenüber herkömmlichen Methoden und Inhalten von Lehre und Lernen
schafft? |
Editorial der Herausgeber 7
Einführung 9
Christoph Revermann
eLearning – Definitionen, Konzepte, Varianten 21
Christoph Revermann
eLearning in der beruflichen Aus- und Weiterbildung 45
Christoph Revermann, Peter Georgieff, Simone Kimpeler
eLearning in der Hochschule – Ein internationaler Vergleich 77
Christoph Revermann
eLearning für ältere Menschen 197
Christoph Revermann, Simone Kimpeler, Peter Georgieff
Summaries 259
Autoren 262
Christoph
Revermann
eLearning – Definitionen, Konzepte, Varianten
Summary: The understanding of eLearning has changed continually over the years.
The original highly technologically characterized definition is currently being
rediscussed and modified in connection with the integration of more
comprehensive didactic concepts. This continual process of change requires
various forms of eLearning to be taken into account; there is no one single
concept of eLearning. eLearning is applied to all forms of teaching and learning
which are supported or made possible by new ICT technologies, and which serve
the recording, storage, handling and processing, application and presentation of
information or learning content. The layout of the digital content can be
interactive and multimedia, i.e. texts, graphics, audio and video sequences,
animations and interactive functionalities can be used. The learning processes
can be complemented by net-based communication between the learner, tutor,
lecturer or fellow learner (through email, chat rooms and collaborative working
environments).
Christoph Revermann, Peter Georgieff, Simone Kimpeler
eLearning in der beruflichen Bildung
Summary: eLearning will probably transform the vocational education system seen
as a whole in much the same way that “eBusiness” has already transformed the
entire economy. However eLearning will not replace other training instruments,
but will rather qualitatively complement them. But the expectations that were
raised several years ago through analyses of potentials have to date been only
partially met on the basis of current experience. The preparation,
representation and quality of the eLearning content make up the decisive success
factors for both facilitators as well as the learners, and there is still
considerable potential for development in these areas. eLearning will only then
be able to assert itself in the long term in everyday operational life as well,
when acceptance and implementation is ensured and the eLearning courses provide
all concerned with the desired added value. In order for this to be achieved
there is a requirement for firstly, a significantly more detailed insight into
the embedding of learning processes in the habitual or working world, and
secondly for instruments, which ensure the quality of eLearning content during
its creation or application. Not until these hurdles are cleared will eLearning
be able to develop its potential for vocational and further training.
Christoph Revermann
eLearning in der Hochschule
Summary: In view of the international marketing of education as well as various
efforts but also an internationally increasing interconnectedness, it is of
increasing importance to recognise the market potentials as well as the
development strategies of other nations and to learn from the experience in the
use of eLearning there, to be able to profit from the development of
competencies or also the achievement of innovation potentials. In this view the
northern European countries however can be found in the top places. Similarly in
comparable studies into educational standards such as PISA, Finland as well as
Great Britain, Switzerland, the USA and Australia generally compared favourably,
while Germany ranked nearer the OECD average. There are also numerous measures
in Germany for implementing ICT and eLearning, which however began much later
than in the other countries. What is noticeable in studies on eLearning in the
university sector is also the lack – on an international scale – of overall
coordination and the low level of interconnectedness among the various public
and private eLearning actors. Whereas Australia, the USA, Finland and England
appear to collect stimuli throughout the world and specifically target foreign
markets (in particular Australia), Germany is gradually beginning to take steps
in the international education market within the framework of initiatives.
eLearning at universities is by no means a “surefire success”, but rather has to
be made possible through innovative concepts – which need to be combined with
considerable continual efforts. This assumes a pragmatically oriented new
approach: From “best practice” to “good enough practice”, from innovative from a
research point of view to useful from an everyday point of view, from a supply
to a demand orientation, from eLearning to a service-oriented E-Campus. What
will be decisive for the success of a systematic and professional application of
IT in the university and in teaching – as the central service sector of every
university – will be less the IT systems used and rather the ideas, the people
and the strategies behind them.
Christoph Revermann, Peter Georgieff, Simone Kimpeler
eLearning für Ältere Menschen
Summary: Informal learning has greater significance for elderly people than
formal learning. At the same time the acquisition or retention of independence
and self-determination is also an essential goal of learning at a more advanced
age. An analysis of the market for eLearning services for elderly people shows
first of all that eLearning products hardly exist or are only cautiously
marketed. Secondly the market also seems relatively confusing: The services are
strongly concentrated on technical subjects; there is a lack of services which
are related to life conditions (e.g. learning to age, health and prevention).
Education and the learning of specific content have as yet only found expression
in very few of the providers’ product development and marketing activities. A
clear definition of the aim of the respective services or the instruments
employed is also necessary (which group of the elderly is appealed to, what
prior technical knowledge has to be taken into consideration, and what content
is to be conveyed?) as well as a conclusive evaluation concept that accompanies
the respective projects right from the beginning. Intensified research efforts
are necessary for the target group of the elderly. These have partly to gather
saved information and differentiated data for the first time ever, to identify
the prerequisites for the use of computers and the Internet – and thereby active
participation in eLearning courses – which establish the target group of the
elderly and which interests and ambitions they pursue when using eLearning in
the context of lifelong learning.